
This movie really steps over the line.
4 of 4 people found this review helpful.
In taking into account the pros and cons about a film, I just first usually ask myself, "Self, do I ever want to watch something like this again or even recommend this film for anyone to watch?" If the answer is no then I'm pretty sure that it's not a keeper.
The movie was way too macabre for me in parts and serve's no redeeming purpose other than just pure entertainment. However, this type of entertainment was quite grotesque, morbid, sick, and boderline pornographic. The frontal nudity thing added to the murderous acts was just way to much for me and I'm sure for most viewers as well. Not to mention the stage hand that ate maggots and live rats heads. Boy that sounds yummy and pure fun.
These types of movies always leave me feeling sick with my head spinning away from reality. The psychotic nature of the film and the mind altering drug theme all play into the surreal feeling that make you just want to turn the thing off and watch something else.
The immoral treatment of women in films has gotten way out of hand and serves no purpose whatsoever. It doesn't even have any explainable reason why this is even in the film to begin with except to make it so grungy and reprehensible that you'll want to keep watching just to see if might get any worst. How far down the path of hell does a film need to take it's viewers is the real question. This onstage diabolical supposed magic using predetermined females from audience to murder onstage and then the miraculously reappear untouched was surely the rave of these spectators. Edmond (Kip Pardue) stumbles around with his paper bag, trying to figure this out but he becomes mesmerized with finding out the answers to this bizarre trick then, afterward, girls die deaths very similar to the stage death.
Montag the Magnificent was one of Crispen Glover's most disturbed characters besides Willard. We have many comments about Glover's own feeling about these types of film. He mentions the following subjects:
"I think what eccentricity can represent in terms of the fear it engenders is a challenge to what is already considered right or good by people who have invested a certain amount into their life and livelihood that is not eccentric, but centric. If there's a challenge to that, that can make people concerned that either what is considered a safe way of living or a good way of living may be pulled out from under them. I can understand that. That's why countercultural film movements are important since it's lacking in the culture right now. There's an idea that there's value to an alternate point of view, but everything that's presented in the media is procultural, and it makes people nervous when there hasn't been a true discussion of alternate points of view. There's no general discussion in the media. [On being called eccentric] Eccentric doesn't bother me. "Eccentric" being a poetic interpretation of a mathematical term meaning something that doesn't follow the lines-that's OK.
This county has it's own propaganda, but it's very effective because people don't realize that it's propaganda. And it's subtle, but it's actually a much stronger propaganda machine than the Nazis had but it's funded in a different way. With the Nazis it was funded by the government, but in the United States, it's funded by corporations & they only want things to happen that will make people want to buy stuff. So whatever that is, then that is considered okay & good,but that doesn't necessarily mean it serve people
Review ID: 10000000012177793

Thank you for voting. If your vote meets our
guidelines, it will be posted within 24 hours.
You cannot vote on the helpfulness of a review you wrote.
Your request cannot be processed at this time. Please try again later.