
Torts and Personal Injury Law
1 of 1 people found this review helpful.
The authors do a good job of laying out the elements to the torts. Hypotheticals or illustrative cases come at the end of a subsection and are rather common. The chapters start out with an introduction that describes the torts that will be reviewed in the chapter.
While the authors devout three pages to Palsgraf, they fail to talk about the policy issues about duty that the majority and dissent make, about duty to the whole world versus to an identifiable plaintiff, Such an explanation would account for why the parts of Palsgraf belong there. This is a critical case about duty and causation, which is dropped into the material without explanation of its significance.
The hypotheticals break the rhythm of the material, though, so that the reader encounters material in a ‘start and stop’ fashion. Trying to be ‘all things to all people’, the authors frequently include illustrative cases, especially on recent developments on the law which contributes to disrupted flow of information to the reader.
Review ID: 10000000002781738

Thank you for voting. If your vote meets our
guidelines, it will be posted within 24 hours.
You cannot vote on the helpfulness of a review you wrote.
Your request cannot be processed at this time. Please try again later.