| ||||
*Learn more | ||||
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-R1 10.3 Megapixel
| |
Product ID: EPID48329389
Description: The bigger the imager, the better the image. That's why the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-R1 incorporates an APS-class image sensor more than 12 times the size of the typical sensor. You'll get high sensitivity, low noise and a phenomenal 10.3 Meg...
Portions of this page Copyright 1997 - 2009 CNET Channel. All rights reserved.
Buy this item
$113.61(4 Bids )
$525.00(1 Bid )
Top Reviews
Sony DSC-R1 combines world-class sensor and lensReview created: 04/25/06
by:
) 
35 of 39 people found this review helpful.
I have two DSC-R1s, and although I am selling one of them it is my favorite camera. I am a professional photographer, and the DSC-R1 makes tripod work easier than any other camera. The multi-angle LCD, and a joystick-controlled manual focus function are two features that make it much easier to use than any DSLR when shooting landscapes and architecture.
This Sony is in a class of its own when it comes to image quality. Even a $3000 DSLR rig would be hard pressed to deliver the same quality. What's missing? Image stabilization would be nice, and the 2-shot RAW buffer could be more generous - the DSC-R1 is not the best camera for shooting sports. However as a vacation/hobbyist/Pro backup camera, it has no competition in terms of capability and quality.
This Sony is in a class of its own when it comes to image quality. Even a $3000 DSLR rig would be hard pressed to deliver the same quality. What's missing? Image stabilization would be nice, and the 2-shot RAW buffer could be more generous - the DSC-R1 is not the best camera for shooting sports. However as a vacation/hobbyist/Pro backup camera, it has no competition in terms of capability and quality.
Review ID: 10000000000891676
Was this review helpful? Report this review
Thank you for voting. If your vote meets our Beautiful Device for Amateurs and Professionals Alike
) 16 of 16 people found this review helpful.
Recognizing that the world is going digital when it comes to photography, I decided that now was probably the time to begin considering a digital camera. While I had had some experience with Canon point and shoot digital cameras like the A430 I quickly came to realize the benefits and possibilities found with owning and using a digital camera.
Having read numerous reviews on point and shoots, prosumers and DSLRs the choice of what type to get was quickly resolved based on quality of image, price and features. Despite coming across sites trying to dispell the supposed misconceptions about megapixels and the thought that a 5 or 6MP camera would do a wonderful job taking photos, I soon put two and two together to discover that if I ever planned on printing 8x10 photos I would require the highest possible megapixel number that was possible. Of course, while DSLRs by Canon and Nikon have broken the 10MP threshold with offerings of 12+ and 16.7MP in the case of the Canon 1Ds Mark II, they carry a hefty price tag of $5000+ from reputable dealers. Anything cheaper, in the form of a DSLR would mean sacrificing features and build quality. The other thing to consider was the cost of accessories. DSLRs rarely if ever come with lenses; if they are included as a kit package, they are always of lesser quality and do not provide the wide range of focal lengths needed for the amateur photographer who wants pictures like the pros but isn't being paid for their work.
Issues related to the size of image sensors found in point and shoots quickly became a bone of contention. While they are highly portable, almost to a fault, the miniscule size of their sensor means that image noise at ISOs of more than 100 makes printing and enlarging the images futile. You'll wonder how that 'snow' ended up in your photos from the beach. While they may be had for relative peanuts, point and shoots are suitable for only the most casual of photog, someone who rarely uses a camera and isn't interested in printing images larger than 4x6, if that.
In my case, prosumers filled the void. They offer the possibility of near identical build and lens quality and features found in high end DSLRs as well as point and shoot presets that make convenience possible. Offerings from Minolta, Fujifilm and others prove to be some of the cheapest prosumers available ($600 and under) but as the adage goes, you get what you pay for. In these cases this means high noise levels at relatively low ISOs (~400), smaller than suitable sensor size, poor lenses and less than desired build quality.
The SONY DSC R1 ended up being everything and then some for what I wanted in my first digital camera. A top shelf Carl Zeiss lens with the widest 24mm lens available in a prosumer. Telephoto to 120mm gives you more than enough range for everyday shots. I won't go into the rest of the features available on the camera since they are too numerous to fully detail in this space and are described virtually everywhere on the net. Suffice it to say that this camera could and would act as a highly competent backup for a professional photographer or an equally capable stand-alone for an amateur like me. Being FAT32 compatible with dual memory capability (MS Pro/Pro Duo, CF II) plugging in an 8GB Seagate photo drive/microdrive is a cinch and offers very reasonable space for the hefty 5MB HQ jpgs taken with this camera. Lest I forget, let me mention that a major selling point is the camera's ability to take RAW images.
Having read numerous reviews on point and shoots, prosumers and DSLRs the choice of what type to get was quickly resolved based on quality of image, price and features. Despite coming across sites trying to dispell the supposed misconceptions about megapixels and the thought that a 5 or 6MP camera would do a wonderful job taking photos, I soon put two and two together to discover that if I ever planned on printing 8x10 photos I would require the highest possible megapixel number that was possible. Of course, while DSLRs by Canon and Nikon have broken the 10MP threshold with offerings of 12+ and 16.7MP in the case of the Canon 1Ds Mark II, they carry a hefty price tag of $5000+ from reputable dealers. Anything cheaper, in the form of a DSLR would mean sacrificing features and build quality. The other thing to consider was the cost of accessories. DSLRs rarely if ever come with lenses; if they are included as a kit package, they are always of lesser quality and do not provide the wide range of focal lengths needed for the amateur photographer who wants pictures like the pros but isn't being paid for their work.
Issues related to the size of image sensors found in point and shoots quickly became a bone of contention. While they are highly portable, almost to a fault, the miniscule size of their sensor means that image noise at ISOs of more than 100 makes printing and enlarging the images futile. You'll wonder how that 'snow' ended up in your photos from the beach. While they may be had for relative peanuts, point and shoots are suitable for only the most casual of photog, someone who rarely uses a camera and isn't interested in printing images larger than 4x6, if that.
In my case, prosumers filled the void. They offer the possibility of near identical build and lens quality and features found in high end DSLRs as well as point and shoot presets that make convenience possible. Offerings from Minolta, Fujifilm and others prove to be some of the cheapest prosumers available ($600 and under) but as the adage goes, you get what you pay for. In these cases this means high noise levels at relatively low ISOs (~400), smaller than suitable sensor size, poor lenses and less than desired build quality.
The SONY DSC R1 ended up being everything and then some for what I wanted in my first digital camera. A top shelf Carl Zeiss lens with the widest 24mm lens available in a prosumer. Telephoto to 120mm gives you more than enough range for everyday shots. I won't go into the rest of the features available on the camera since they are too numerous to fully detail in this space and are described virtually everywhere on the net. Suffice it to say that this camera could and would act as a highly competent backup for a professional photographer or an equally capable stand-alone for an amateur like me. Being FAT32 compatible with dual memory capability (MS Pro/Pro Duo, CF II) plugging in an 8GB Seagate photo drive/microdrive is a cinch and offers very reasonable space for the hefty 5MB HQ jpgs taken with this camera. Lest I forget, let me mention that a major selling point is the camera's ability to take RAW images.
Review ID: 10000000001410906
Was this review helpful? Report this review
Sort by:
Reviews
Semi Professional Prosumer Camera19 of 26 people found this review helpful.
10.3 Mega resolution, APS size (21.5x14.4mm) CMOS sensor relatively larger than any other prosumer range camera. This will be really great in comparing image from sony's F 828 camera because size of sensor was just 8.8 x 6.6mm, which is relatively very smaller than DSC R1. But macro focusminimum focusing distance was really poor,if this camera would have less than 35cm, I feel this really a great product. The image out put is really awesome. We will have great freedom to talke prints up to A2 size with out any distortion or pixelisation. Normally compact or prosumer range range we will have more freedom of taking close up shots. This is the area Sony should improve I think. Design which make the DSC-R1 unique are the top mounted LCD monitor and EVF assembly. The body is constructed from a thick plastic material with a metal sub-structure, But I feel metal/magnesium body would be more solid for these kind of camera.
Review ID: 10000000000736663
Was this review helpful? Report this review
Great Camera with a Learning Curve
) 16 of 17 people found this review helpful.
I recently bought this camera as an upgrade from my Sony 8.0 MP 828. This is my third Sony SLR-like camera, with my first one being the 5 MP 717. I upgraded to this one in order to get photos that were as clear and as sharp as possible from the miniature items that I buy and sell.
As I found with the 828 when upgrading from the 717, there was a significant learning curve over previous cameras. However, now with my third Sony camera, I've discovered that the learning curve lasts for about a month - then one can start taking photos with good results.
The learning curve with the R1 was as predicted. Out of the box, the camera is impressive, if only just in size! It is probably double the weight (or at least close) to a 717, and is probably 25% larger than the 828. The lens is a whopping 67mm - a full increment larger than the 828. The next thing you notice on the camera is the lack of an LCD viewfinder, which Sony took off the camera and placed on an adjustable screen on top of the camera. Quite novel.
A quick walk around the camera shows that Sony learned from the cumbersomeness of the 828 with regard to adjustments on the camera and made the R1 very "user friendly." The camera is easy to hold (though heavy) with one hand, and the photographer is able to make the adjustments with his other - definitely making it two-handed operation. It seems that just about everything has a button on the back or side of the camera, and once you learn where everything is, it is easy to change the exposure, etc., with just a quick adjustment.
For what I do (and if you're planning to use it for eBay sales for small objects, this is something to keep in mind) the major initial drawback was the focus length of the camera. Unlike the 828, where you could be within inches of the object and shoot beautiful closeups, this camera requires at least a foot, if not more, in order to focus. Once you get it to the right focal length (and after the purchase of a macro filter - a must have) the shots are glorious. HOWEVER, what does a long focal length with detailed photos mean? You MUST have the camera stabilized (tripod, etc.) in order to get good shots. Hand-held detail shots are a no-go with this camera. Also, if you like to take .mpg movies through your camera, you'll be disappointed. This camera does not have that capability.
As far as plusses, the camera is super high quality, and is relatively easy to use. The lens is fantastic, and the rest of the camera seems to be as equal in quality. I've gotten used to the LCD viewfinder, and have been able to use it for some great shots that I might not of otherwise been able to view with the fixed viewfinder.
Would I buy another? I'm not sure. I'm a fan of getting new toys, so I had to have it. However, I think my 828 may take better (or at least easier) close up shots. I must admit that I haven't taken this camera on a road trip just yet to take outdoor photos, and I can only imagine that with the lens and processor that it will be terrific. My word of advice would be: if you HAVE to have the highest-end quasi-SLR, then this camera is for you. Overall, I'm happy with this camera, but I just don't know if it might just be worthwhile moving over to the quality SLRs that don't cost much more than this, such as the Canon 20D. Though I'll happily use this camera for now, I believe that my next upgrade will be to a quality SLR.
As I found with the 828 when upgrading from the 717, there was a significant learning curve over previous cameras. However, now with my third Sony camera, I've discovered that the learning curve lasts for about a month - then one can start taking photos with good results.
The learning curve with the R1 was as predicted. Out of the box, the camera is impressive, if only just in size! It is probably double the weight (or at least close) to a 717, and is probably 25% larger than the 828. The lens is a whopping 67mm - a full increment larger than the 828. The next thing you notice on the camera is the lack of an LCD viewfinder, which Sony took off the camera and placed on an adjustable screen on top of the camera. Quite novel.
A quick walk around the camera shows that Sony learned from the cumbersomeness of the 828 with regard to adjustments on the camera and made the R1 very "user friendly." The camera is easy to hold (though heavy) with one hand, and the photographer is able to make the adjustments with his other - definitely making it two-handed operation. It seems that just about everything has a button on the back or side of the camera, and once you learn where everything is, it is easy to change the exposure, etc., with just a quick adjustment.
For what I do (and if you're planning to use it for eBay sales for small objects, this is something to keep in mind) the major initial drawback was the focus length of the camera. Unlike the 828, where you could be within inches of the object and shoot beautiful closeups, this camera requires at least a foot, if not more, in order to focus. Once you get it to the right focal length (and after the purchase of a macro filter - a must have) the shots are glorious. HOWEVER, what does a long focal length with detailed photos mean? You MUST have the camera stabilized (tripod, etc.) in order to get good shots. Hand-held detail shots are a no-go with this camera. Also, if you like to take .mpg movies through your camera, you'll be disappointed. This camera does not have that capability.
As far as plusses, the camera is super high quality, and is relatively easy to use. The lens is fantastic, and the rest of the camera seems to be as equal in quality. I've gotten used to the LCD viewfinder, and have been able to use it for some great shots that I might not of otherwise been able to view with the fixed viewfinder.
Would I buy another? I'm not sure. I'm a fan of getting new toys, so I had to have it. However, I think my 828 may take better (or at least easier) close up shots. I must admit that I haven't taken this camera on a road trip just yet to take outdoor photos, and I can only imagine that with the lens and processor that it will be terrific. My word of advice would be: if you HAVE to have the highest-end quasi-SLR, then this camera is for you. Overall, I'm happy with this camera, but I just don't know if it might just be worthwhile moving over to the quality SLRs that don't cost much more than this, such as the Canon 20D. Though I'll happily use this camera for now, I believe that my next upgrade will be to a quality SLR.
Review ID: 10000000001257323
Was this review helpful? Report this review
Great Digital Camera High Quality+8 of 15 people found this review helpful.
This is a great camera for the price all the ease of a point-and-shoot
Easy export features.You dont need to install software to offload the photos to a computer.You can just plug in the usb cable to camera and computer and transfer photos quick.Top reasons to buy this camera over others
Small, lightweight, easy to use.High Quality photos.
Very quick bootup and very responsive shutter speed.
Good on batteries, but still, get rechargeable batteries save you alot of money $
Buy it.You will not be disappointed.
Easy export features.You dont need to install software to offload the photos to a computer.You can just plug in the usb cable to camera and computer and transfer photos quick.Top reasons to buy this camera over others
Small, lightweight, easy to use.High Quality photos.
Very quick bootup and very responsive shutter speed.
Good on batteries, but still, get rechargeable batteries save you alot of money $
Buy it.You will not be disappointed.
Review ID: 10000000001001595
Was this review helpful? Report this review
Sony DSC-R1
) 4 of 5 people found this review helpful.
This camera replaced a Sony F717. Features are similar but controls and locations are more user friendly. Menus are easier to access and give the user many options to fine tune photos. Viewfinder is flexible and allows camera to be used from many body positions. Pictures are excellent, even more brilliant than from the Sony F717. Camera is heavy but has a very good grip and is comfortable to use, even after sightseeing for hours. I don't like having to use an extra support bracket to add a wide angle or telephoto adapter and I wish the zoom range were longer. I use the HVL-F32X flash with hot shoe and get very acceptable pictures at almost 100 feet in near darkness, although manual focus is necessary at those ranges. Autofocus just can't handle it. With an adapter ring, all my old accessories work with this camera as do the memory sticks and batteries. I like the two types of photo storage - memory stick and compact flash - like always having a backup. This camera worked well on a tripod but the body has no hole for the anchor pin, just the threaded hole. Overall, very happy with the DSC-R1 and would replace it if lost or damaged. Probably not too suitable for casual users but when I play tourist,I shoot over 1000 pictures in a weekend and I am particular with the results. Certainly a camera for an avid photographer to consider.
Review ID: 10000000002972062
Was this review helpful? Report this review
SONY R1, REVIEW.3 of 5 people found this review helpful.
Well, i finally got this SONY R1 after i've read a lot of reviews on it.. i paid 585$ here on ebay..
this R1 has a very nice lens and its range from 24-135mm, great images quality, with its big sensor like a DSLR, easy to use. low noise at high iso.
other than that , i think for its price the r1 is over price..due its lack of a lot of features, compare to panasonic fz20, fz30. To use R1 external flash you have to go to menu and change it to external flash, if not in use you have to go to menu and change it back,can be easily to forget..R1 battery recharging has to hook it up to camera and plug to the wall outlet, this is a big disadvantage, you can not use the camera when its charging. Therefore i had to buy an extra batt for its..
R1 is not a fast shooting camera, it AF is kinda slow, especially in the dim light.
So!, if you can buy it for under 500$, its ok. great images , but slow shooting, or buy panasonic fz30 with alot more features and longer zoom lens, plus leica f2.8. lens.
i have both FZ30 and R1, i like them both i use them for everyday shooting or on vacation.
i use R1 for its wide at 24mm, and FZ30 for its tele at 420-650mm.
In all i love R1 image quality very much, one of the best ive seen so far..i have to say its images look better than FZ30 and many other DSLRs.
I just wish it has image stabilizer and longer tele end..but that may be asking too much. its deffenetly a baby DSLR.
my 2centz.
this R1 has a very nice lens and its range from 24-135mm, great images quality, with its big sensor like a DSLR, easy to use. low noise at high iso.
other than that , i think for its price the r1 is over price..due its lack of a lot of features, compare to panasonic fz20, fz30. To use R1 external flash you have to go to menu and change it to external flash, if not in use you have to go to menu and change it back,can be easily to forget..R1 battery recharging has to hook it up to camera and plug to the wall outlet, this is a big disadvantage, you can not use the camera when its charging. Therefore i had to buy an extra batt for its..
R1 is not a fast shooting camera, it AF is kinda slow, especially in the dim light.
So!, if you can buy it for under 500$, its ok. great images , but slow shooting, or buy panasonic fz30 with alot more features and longer zoom lens, plus leica f2.8. lens.
i have both FZ30 and R1, i like them both i use them for everyday shooting or on vacation.
i use R1 for its wide at 24mm, and FZ30 for its tele at 420-650mm.
In all i love R1 image quality very much, one of the best ive seen so far..i have to say its images look better than FZ30 and many other DSLRs.
I just wish it has image stabilizer and longer tele end..but that may be asking too much. its deffenetly a baby DSLR.
my 2centz.
Review ID: 10000000002933463
Was this review helpful? Report this review
Buyer Beware2 of 5 people found this review helpful.
I have been using ebay for years and have had a few non payments or new ebayers who think this is a department store, but aside from that it has been a great experience-until now. I have been looking for this camera and kept bidding against this 1 other person with zero feedback-back & forth (I forgot to mention, the seller was new to ebay-zero feedback, but I figured, hey, we were all new once!). I won the auction. I emaile dthe seller to make sure there was a tracking # so I could know when to receive it (I spent over $500 for this camera). After 3 days of no response I got worried-after 2 weeks I knew I had been scammed. I payed through paypal so I thought I was protected-well, because he was a new seller I was only protected up to $200!! Ebay said paypal would handle it, but more importantly I wanted this person to be held liable-they obviously have his bank account info if he accepted my funds!
Anyway, I have gone to my bank to try & get ALL of my money refunded.
I hate to say this, but beware of sellers with zero feedback-especially when it is a big ticket item. I learned my lesson the hard way!
I hope this helps!
Anyway, I have gone to my bank to try & get ALL of my money refunded.
I hate to say this, but beware of sellers with zero feedback-especially when it is a big ticket item. I learned my lesson the hard way!
I hope this helps!
Review ID: 10000000008998803
Was this review helpful? Report this review
Sony Cybershot DSC-R1 The best camera so far!2 of 3 people found this review helpful.
The R1 is in a league by itself due to it's large sensor and fixed lens. All other fixed lens cameras use the smaller sensors which are prone to grainy details in some photos. The camera has some drawbacks but photography is all about trade-offs. The R1 has live preview which is rare for a large sensor camera. (Only the Olympus E330 has such a design)
The controls are very well laid out and easy to use while looking through the view finder. ISO, EV, Flash, Shutter speed and aperture are all easily selected. The strength of the R1 is landscape and portrait photography. I wouldn't suggest you use it for sports or other fast action shots where you need a burst of several shots at once.
The lens alone is worth the price of the camera. To get the 24mm, 2.8 lens on another camera you will have to spend above $2,000. I got an excellent used R1 for $725 including external flash and memory sticks worth three hundred dollars. It is clearly the best deal out there is it fits your needs.
I already owned two Sony F828 cameras and loved their style and function, but I wanted something with a larger sensor and more creative control.
I may end up buying a Nikon D80 some time in the near future, but for the price of a nice lens I have a great camera that can be a primary or back-up.
I highly recommend it.
The controls are very well laid out and easy to use while looking through the view finder. ISO, EV, Flash, Shutter speed and aperture are all easily selected. The strength of the R1 is landscape and portrait photography. I wouldn't suggest you use it for sports or other fast action shots where you need a burst of several shots at once.
The lens alone is worth the price of the camera. To get the 24mm, 2.8 lens on another camera you will have to spend above $2,000. I got an excellent used R1 for $725 including external flash and memory sticks worth three hundred dollars. It is clearly the best deal out there is it fits your needs.
I already owned two Sony F828 cameras and loved their style and function, but I wanted something with a larger sensor and more creative control.
I may end up buying a Nikon D80 some time in the near future, but for the price of a nice lens I have a great camera that can be a primary or back-up.
I highly recommend it.
Review ID: 10000000002596708
Was this review helpful? Report this review
Lens & picture quality better than my digital SLRReview created: 12/31/06
by:
2 of 4 people found this review helpful.
I bought my DSC-R1 on e-bay 4 months ago. I am still singing praises about it. I also own a Fuji S2 digital SLR with Nikon lenses for years. The Fuji 6 megapixel is uncomparable to the Sony 10 MB, the Sony colour saturation is also better. There is shutter lag in the Sony as compare to any DSLR and it takes longer to focus in dim light. The biggest attraction to Sony is it's 10MB and its superb lens, 24-120mm (35mm format)Carl Zeiss T* lens. You cannot buy this lens separate anywhere. A Nikon 16-35mm will set you back $1700. For less than $800 in e-bay you are getting a very good camera. Hope you share my view.
Review ID: 10000000002579503
Was this review helpful? Report this review
Ahead of its Time?1 of 1 people found this review helpful.
When the R1 came to be, Sony had just produced the Best, non-DSLR in the business. The 10mp, APS sensor allows one to keep up with the DSLR Joneses. I'm talking about big enlargements- to 17 or 20". I can see certain Pros completely satisfied with this shooter. With its APS sized sensor the R1 leaves the other "point & shoots" in the dust. The R1, though not equipped for long range, easily and beautifully covers all the short to mid-range ground one might encounter.
If you can find an R1, in very good condition, Snap it Up!
Buying mine on eBay, for an extremely good price, was the way to Go!
I've been nothing but happy with all images taken- knowing its limitations going in.
I strongly recommend a good Sony (or other Upper level equivalent) flash for indoors and out. And a polarizing filter. A Pro Wedding and portrait shooter could be satisfactorily equipped with only the R1, tri-pod and flash.
Beautiful and natural colors every time!
With its F2.8 aperture at a true 24mm, you won't miss the lack of Sony's IS (Image Stabilization). And at the upper end, a true 120mm, one is well equipped for portraits.
As of this writing, 08/04/08, amazon.com lists one, new, for $1999.99!!!
Get on eBay and beat the heck out of that!
The R1 could very well be the Best, general purpose, all round camera ever made!
Try to pull something better out of your pocket!
If you can find an R1, in very good condition, Snap it Up!
Buying mine on eBay, for an extremely good price, was the way to Go!
I've been nothing but happy with all images taken- knowing its limitations going in.
I strongly recommend a good Sony (or other Upper level equivalent) flash for indoors and out. And a polarizing filter. A Pro Wedding and portrait shooter could be satisfactorily equipped with only the R1, tri-pod and flash.
Beautiful and natural colors every time!
With its F2.8 aperture at a true 24mm, you won't miss the lack of Sony's IS (Image Stabilization). And at the upper end, a true 120mm, one is well equipped for portraits.
As of this writing, 08/04/08, amazon.com lists one, new, for $1999.99!!!
Get on eBay and beat the heck out of that!
The R1 could very well be the Best, general purpose, all round camera ever made!
Try to pull something better out of your pocket!
Review ID: 10000000008172969
Was this review helpful? Report this review
Think about this camera as an SLR (with a fixed lens)1 of 1 people found this review helpful.
First of all, its important to clarify that you have to think about this camera as an SLR (with a fixed lens) and not a bridge/zuperzoom camera. Why? Because the Sony DSC-R1 incorporates an APS-Class (APS-C) image sensor, more than 3 times the size of the sensor used on bridge/superzoom cameras. Thats huge, uh?
Ok, what does a more than 3 times the size of a bridge/superzoom CCD can produce on image quality? A much more detailed and real image due to the high dynamic range of this type of sensor. The Sony DCS-R1 APS-C sensor goes beyond anything bridge/zuperzoom related and can capture shadows and light in much more depth, not creating the undesired highlights that small sensors capture and showing the most out of the dark zones of your photos. This alone makes ALL the difference. APS-Class (APS-C) CCD vs typical CCD. What these sensors can capture compared to the small ones is huge.
And theres more and this is as important as the CCD (or sensor if you prefer): the LENS. Ok, here's where the Sony DSC-R1 is a real winner with a high-end 24-120mm (14-71mm equivalent)f/2.8-f/4.5 lens. These lens are so sharp that can capture much more detail than the kit lenses provided with the SLR cameras. You can't even compare. If you want to buy a lens of this caliber for your nice SLR, you need to spend something like $900 just on the lens. Are you prepared for such an investment plus the body to get the image quality that the Sony DSC-R1 produces? Lets say, a $1800 investment at least? Here's where once again the Sony DSC-R1 shines. Nowadays for about $700 you can get one like new (theres still a few) that got it all. The great body, the big APS-C sensor and the high-end lens. And unlike the SLR's you won't get dust on the sensor that requires more expenses on tech support to clean it.
Think about all these advantages and if you don't have the $$, don't waste it on a SLR with a cheap poor image quality lens when you can take better pictures with the Sony DSC-R1.
THE BIG DIFFERENCE FOR SOME: The viewfinder. Unlike the SLR's with interchangeable lenses, the Sony DSC-R1 comes with an high resolution electronic viewfinder vs an optic viewfinder. Many photographers prefer optic, but this elctronic viewfinder from SONY is sharp enough to let you see every detail. And to help you even more, Sony has incorporated 2 fantastic features in the viewfinder such as a real time histogram (this will be your most useful tool for the right exposure) and a "Zebra" mode that allows you to see wich areas are too bright and adjust the exposure. 10 out of 10 to these 2 features in the viewfinder.
CONCLUSION: I have been doing some award winning landscape photos with this camera and if I don't show the exif everybody thinks that I'm using an expensive SLR with a high-end lens that costs as much as the body. It has been doing a great job. Hats off to Sony for such an excelent camera and a bargain.
Ok, what does a more than 3 times the size of a bridge/superzoom CCD can produce on image quality? A much more detailed and real image due to the high dynamic range of this type of sensor. The Sony DCS-R1 APS-C sensor goes beyond anything bridge/zuperzoom related and can capture shadows and light in much more depth, not creating the undesired highlights that small sensors capture and showing the most out of the dark zones of your photos. This alone makes ALL the difference. APS-Class (APS-C) CCD vs typical CCD. What these sensors can capture compared to the small ones is huge.
And theres more and this is as important as the CCD (or sensor if you prefer): the LENS. Ok, here's where the Sony DSC-R1 is a real winner with a high-end 24-120mm (14-71mm equivalent)f/2.8-f/4.5 lens. These lens are so sharp that can capture much more detail than the kit lenses provided with the SLR cameras. You can't even compare. If you want to buy a lens of this caliber for your nice SLR, you need to spend something like $900 just on the lens. Are you prepared for such an investment plus the body to get the image quality that the Sony DSC-R1 produces? Lets say, a $1800 investment at least? Here's where once again the Sony DSC-R1 shines. Nowadays for about $700 you can get one like new (theres still a few) that got it all. The great body, the big APS-C sensor and the high-end lens. And unlike the SLR's you won't get dust on the sensor that requires more expenses on tech support to clean it.
Think about all these advantages and if you don't have the $$, don't waste it on a SLR with a cheap poor image quality lens when you can take better pictures with the Sony DSC-R1.
THE BIG DIFFERENCE FOR SOME: The viewfinder. Unlike the SLR's with interchangeable lenses, the Sony DSC-R1 comes with an high resolution electronic viewfinder vs an optic viewfinder. Many photographers prefer optic, but this elctronic viewfinder from SONY is sharp enough to let you see every detail. And to help you even more, Sony has incorporated 2 fantastic features in the viewfinder such as a real time histogram (this will be your most useful tool for the right exposure) and a "Zebra" mode that allows you to see wich areas are too bright and adjust the exposure. 10 out of 10 to these 2 features in the viewfinder.
CONCLUSION: I have been doing some award winning landscape photos with this camera and if I don't show the exif everybody thinks that I'm using an expensive SLR with a high-end lens that costs as much as the body. It has been doing a great job. Hats off to Sony for such an excelent camera and a bargain.
Review ID: 10000000007302814
Was this review helpful? Report this review
Great Camera works perfect!Review created: 04/09/08
by:
blankman101 ( 6 )
1 of 1 people found this review helpful.
The camera works perfect. Could not have asked for anything better. I have used the camera at least 30 times sinse purchase wirth out any problems.
Review ID: 10000000006612061
Was this review helpful? Report this review
It's all good...Review created: 04/01/08
by:
) 1 of 1 people found this review helpful.
Love the camera except for one thing, the zoom is not motorized...Other then that its all good!
Keith Lock
Keith Lock
Review ID: 10000000006418901
Was this review helpful? Report this review
In Love With My Sony R11 of 1 people found this review helpful.
For one who can no longer deal with interchangeable lenses, the Sony R 1 is, by far, the best digital camera to come along. When the highest quality lens is married to a large, outstanding, sensor, the best has been achieved.
Many of my images are enlarged to 13X19 inches and beyond. the results are as good as one can get.
Many of my images are enlarged to 13X19 inches and beyond. the results are as good as one can get.
Review ID: 10000000005238587
Was this review helpful? Report this review
Great camera with many features and extras.1 of 2 people found this review helpful.
This is a bigger, more professional camera than the little point and shoot versions. It came with many extras that would have required a much larger investment if bought seperate. It is more difficult to travel with however, it is well worth it to me. I love the extra battery and media sticks that were included. I am still learning about all the features that will continue to make my photos even more beautiful.
Review ID: 10000000004139896
Was this review helpful? Report this review
never recive the productReview created: 07/04/07
by:
1 of 13 people found this review helpful.
never recive the product¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡
Review ID: 10000000003906418
Was this review helpful? Report this review
SONY UnderstandsReview created: 05/03/07
by:
sharichard ( 3 )
1 of 1 people found this review helpful.
Sony really understands how digital photographers think. The placement and accessibility of buttons and features is simply unmatched by any other manufacturer. I have owned the F-717, F-828, R1, as well as Canon's Rebel XTi, and have used a friends Nikon D20 and his Canon 30D. The problem these others have is that they have years of experience building great FILM cameras, and still think along those lines. With Sony's DSC-R1, all features can be changed on the fly. Try changing the ISO speed on any Nikon or Canon; the R1 can be changed in about two seconds. Digital photographers want to be able to change these kind of settings quickly, while film photographers don't.
The other benefit of the R1 is the lens size and quality. An equivalent lens, with the range and aperture values can't be found for less than $500. The field of focus can be very short with the lens allowing a person to catch some pretty artistic photos. The zoom and focus rings feel perfect. The camera as a whole seems made from very good high-grade plastics and rubber for a solid and secure feeling.
Another thing that deserves mentioning; Sony seems to be the only company that understands that a person's face usually has a nose on the front of it. The eyepiece viewfinder on the R1 protrudes from the camera at least a full inch, which is awesome. Getting my eye up to the flat viewfinder on Canon's XTi is awkward to say the least. But who needs a viewfinder with the R1's *REALLY* nice LCD view screen? It swivels completely around to almost any angle and can lay flat, facing up, for waist-level shooting (I can't emphasize enough how useful this feature is).
Lastly, the flash hot-shoe is off-center (two inches to the right of the lens barrel) which reduces red-eye. The MS/CF door has a good hinge system and holds itself open. The camera accepts memory stick as well as compact flash. The manual focus has a quick-focus button (you can leave it in manual, and press a button for a quick one-time auto focus; pretty handy). And of course, a 10.3 Mega Pixel CMOS, APS sized sensor! The bigger the imager, the cleaner the image (APS stands for Advanced Photo System, 24mm film size).
I love this camera!
The other benefit of the R1 is the lens size and quality. An equivalent lens, with the range and aperture values can't be found for less than $500. The field of focus can be very short with the lens allowing a person to catch some pretty artistic photos. The zoom and focus rings feel perfect. The camera as a whole seems made from very good high-grade plastics and rubber for a solid and secure feeling.
Another thing that deserves mentioning; Sony seems to be the only company that understands that a person's face usually has a nose on the front of it. The eyepiece viewfinder on the R1 protrudes from the camera at least a full inch, which is awesome. Getting my eye up to the flat viewfinder on Canon's XTi is awkward to say the least. But who needs a viewfinder with the R1's *REALLY* nice LCD view screen? It swivels completely around to almost any angle and can lay flat, facing up, for waist-level shooting (I can't emphasize enough how useful this feature is).
Lastly, the flash hot-shoe is off-center (two inches to the right of the lens barrel) which reduces red-eye. The MS/CF door has a good hinge system and holds itself open. The camera accepts memory stick as well as compact flash. The manual focus has a quick-focus button (you can leave it in manual, and press a button for a quick one-time auto focus; pretty handy). And of course, a 10.3 Mega Pixel CMOS, APS sized sensor! The bigger the imager, the cleaner the image (APS stands for Advanced Photo System, 24mm film size).
I love this camera!
Review ID: 10000000003481714
Was this review helpful? Report this review
Great Zeiss T* LensSony DSC R1 bridge camera. I bought one from eBay for £215 in 2009 as I wanted one just for the quality of the lens for landscape work (I also have a Nikon and Canon SLR).The bad points first it`s shutter lag is nowhere near as good as a good SLR, so for work with children etc where you may need several action shots quickly its somewhat lacking.The electronic viewfinder is good but is no substitute for a real time prism finder as in a SLR and the auto switch between LCD and viewfinder is far to sensitive and cuts out when you hold the camera in a waist level position to close to the body very irritating, also with the LCD showing in the top position it is a finger print/mark trap.
Now the good news you can look up the technical spec. on line so I will deal with the day to day use.Put very simply the camera takes really great pictures,hard to quantify why but must be the way Sony don`t do anything half-hearted and they really scored with this c-mos sensor and lens combination shame they stopped making it, but they felt the market was in SLR`s and teamed up with Minolta to use their expertise and range of lenses a shrewd move.
All the controls fall to hand and are easy to access, you can of course set the camera to full auto and take terrific pictures really pin sharp and beautifully colour rendered with great contrast and clarity, or be more creative with the manual settings either way you will not be disappointed.Think of this camera like an old medium format or twin lens reflex film camera and hold it down low at or below waist level and get landscapes and seascapes over water as I do with amazing results. Battery life by the way is brilliant and its worth at a later date getting a HVL-F32X flashgun.
The zoom lens alone would cost a Kings ransom if bought separately so buy with confidence you will not regret it.
Now the good news you can look up the technical spec. on line so I will deal with the day to day use.Put very simply the camera takes really great pictures,hard to quantify why but must be the way Sony don`t do anything half-hearted and they really scored with this c-mos sensor and lens combination shame they stopped making it, but they felt the market was in SLR`s and teamed up with Minolta to use their expertise and range of lenses a shrewd move.
All the controls fall to hand and are easy to access, you can of course set the camera to full auto and take terrific pictures really pin sharp and beautifully colour rendered with great contrast and clarity, or be more creative with the manual settings either way you will not be disappointed.Think of this camera like an old medium format or twin lens reflex film camera and hold it down low at or below waist level and get landscapes and seascapes over water as I do with amazing results. Battery life by the way is brilliant and its worth at a later date getting a HVL-F32X flashgun.
The zoom lens alone would cost a Kings ransom if bought separately so buy with confidence you will not regret it.
Review ID: 10000000013599323
Was this review helpful? Report this review
Just as stated.Prompt service. Great product, completely as advertised. I would buy from this seller again.
Bravo and thank you.
Bravo and thank you.
Review ID: 10000000013365530
Was this review helpful? Report this review
Sony DSC-R1Image quality is excellent because of the size of the sensor and the lens. The viewing screen brightness was excellent 5 years ago, but it seems to be half as bright as a Fuji s100 or s200, or at least the one I have looks that way. The hot shoe on the one I purchased has a wobble in it, but the external flash still works well.
Review ID: 10000000013148517
Was this review helpful? Report this review
Sony DSC-R1 cameraThis camera has a superb 5x zoom Zeiss lens that rivals, or betters, many DSLRs. It's one of the best cameras Sony ever made, and it's a shame that it was discontinued. Those who own and appreciate this camera are hoping Sony will
develop a new, improved R2, but this is unlikely.
develop a new, improved R2, but this is unlikely.
Review ID: 10000000010518883
Was this review helpful? Report this review
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-R1Camera takes outstanding pictures. Has all the bells and whistles you would want in a digital camera. However, if you aren't camera savy or willing to take some time to learn the camera, it's not for you. The built in flash is marginal, would recommend an external flash for large areas.
Review ID: 10000000010451674
Was this review helpful? Report this review
Very good Point-and-Shoot Camera. Not a SLR replacementGeneral
As a point-and-shoot camera, this really rocks. The big sensor and the nice Carl Zeiss lens (24-120mm f/2.8-4.8) is by itself a top feature, and the APS-C sensor makes it even better.
Image Quality
But, the sharpening algorithm seems to introduce artifacts in the image. I now shoot with sharpening turned to the lowest setting. Shooting in RAW is a good option and some landscape pictures shot with it come out terrific, with good pixel-resolution.
RAW or JPEG
But, each RAW is 15-20MB and takes several seconds to write. So, you'll be waiting between shots as well as running out of memory faster. I tried 3 CF cards but the camera wouldn't read any of them, so I stuck with my 4GB Memorystick.
Build and Handling
Very solidly built and lots of buttons for common functions - beautiful. Big and bulky, but if this is the only camera you're taking on a hike or trip, it works really really well. The tilt-LCD is very nice to have, but I wish it'd flip in more angles.
Summary
I like this camera a lot, and it is one of the best point-and-shoot cameras I've ever used. It does suffer from shutter lag which all non-SLR digital cameras suffer from. It has so many advanced features and for the prices it is being sold at (used) these days - I'd say it is a steal. Don't want a SLR camera, but want something more than a P&S - go for the R1.
As a point-and-shoot camera, this really rocks. The big sensor and the nice Carl Zeiss lens (24-120mm f/2.8-4.8) is by itself a top feature, and the APS-C sensor makes it even better.
Image Quality
But, the sharpening algorithm seems to introduce artifacts in the image. I now shoot with sharpening turned to the lowest setting. Shooting in RAW is a good option and some landscape pictures shot with it come out terrific, with good pixel-resolution.
RAW or JPEG
But, each RAW is 15-20MB and takes several seconds to write. So, you'll be waiting between shots as well as running out of memory faster. I tried 3 CF cards but the camera wouldn't read any of them, so I stuck with my 4GB Memorystick.
Build and Handling
Very solidly built and lots of buttons for common functions - beautiful. Big and bulky, but if this is the only camera you're taking on a hike or trip, it works really really well. The tilt-LCD is very nice to have, but I wish it'd flip in more angles.
Summary
I like this camera a lot, and it is one of the best point-and-shoot cameras I've ever used. It does suffer from shutter lag which all non-SLR digital cameras suffer from. It has so many advanced features and for the prices it is being sold at (used) these days - I'd say it is a steal. Don't want a SLR camera, but want something more than a P&S - go for the R1.
Review ID: 10000000009676649
Was this review helpful? Report this review
1 week use by Ex ProHave shot mainly Hassy and 8 x10 Sinars with HM SCh. lenses during career. This camera is exceptional for specific uses. Image quality is superb as is the lens at all focal lengths. General handling and layout of controls works just like my mind does and everything from manual focus to macro Auto focus is accurate. Sort of a dream camera for a silent shooter desiring a capable camera with an exceptional Zeiss lens (surpasses other Zeiss zoom lenses for 35mm) and no sensor dust problems. Compared to Rollei SL35e with HTF 85mm f1.4 lens (considered finest lens made by many) drum scanned from Ektachrome G 100 exposure the two are close to equal pixel to pixel. Sensor and lens are well matched which seems to be the trick in digital. Sony has the experience from their Hollywood 35mm movie digital technology and should eventually supersede most competition.
Review ID: 10000000009508505
Was this review helpful? Report this review
Ready to share your opinion with others? Write a Review
About eBay | Announcements | Security Center | Resolution Center | eBay Toolbar | Policies | Government Relations | Site Map | Help | |
Copyright © 1995-2009 eBay Inc. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of the eBay User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
| |
