Soldier of Fortune (Gold Edition) (PlayStation 2, 2001)

Ok, so it's lame but I had fun playing it. I'm the only one who has finished the game at my house, everyone else has found it boring. Graphics are lame, very unrealistic but was somewhat challenging. Don't spend a lot of money on it and don't get excited about it but it will you something to play while waiting for the next great War Game.

love this game, and old one but awesome.......................​..............................​..............................​..............................​..............................​..............................​..............................​..............................​..............................​..............................​..............................​..............................​..............................​..............................​..............................​..............................​..............................​..............................​..............................​..............................​..............................​..............................​..............................​..............................​..............................​...........................

if you like the old arcad style games than you will love the game. get to shoot up and blow up everything around you. its an ok game but not worth recommending it in my book.

One hell of a gory game for it's time. This game was released in 2000 or 2001 or something like that but it's still a kick-ass game. It's pretty gory, linear, but still fun and isn't like a war shooting game like Soldier of Fortune 2. It's more like Call of Duty 4, every mission is different... Sort of... It's a run-and-shoot-everything-you-s​ee type of game but it ranges from subway tunnels to snowy levels to... Well you get the idea. Story's good but it's something we've seen before. It's still considered one of the bloodiest games today besides Soldier of Fortune II. Violence was pretty realistic for the time it was released.

I was happy with price,conditon and over deal, seel was accurate with discription and the conditions was all that it said it would be.

I bought this game based off of the seller's synopsis as well as what I'd read on Gamespot- what I failed to do, was check the release date of this game. When it was released, it was touted as a really good game, gameplay and graphics being what they were at the time, this rang true. However, the game definitely shows its age now- the graphics are to the point where it looks like the old Doom - remember the first-ever pc game? When it first came out, it was, dare I say, well ahead of its time in terms of graphics? Not the case now- and that's pretty much where you're at with Soldier of Fortune. The graphics were such that I lost interest in the game maybe 15 minutes into playing it. If you like 'classic' (aged) games, you might want to give this a try- for what its worth, it was a good game in its day.