
Seabiscuit Film After Reading the Book

Seabiscuit was a good film and an excellent book. In my limited experience I've noticed people who read to experience, know and be entertained tend to expect a much higher level of nuance, information and pleasure out of a book than they do a film. It stands to reason, a book is considerably more work. People who watch films to experience, know and be entertained tend to more of the wow, splat and bam. Saying this does not preclued enjoyment of both media. The differences in the film and book can best be explained by the time devoted by the reader and viewer to each.
The Seabiscuit story is not as simple as it may sound watching a trailer or reading a book jacket. The film did not have enough time to include all the details that make this little-big-horse story so extrordinary, whereas, the book did. Both were well done but, the better story was told by the book. So much has to be left out to fit the short time the movie plays. It must have been agonizing for the screenwriters and director to decide what will show. Saying this, it still was a very good film.
Reading the book first, as I did, gives one that common feeling that no film will match the book. The film condensation of history was brilliant if, you paid attention to all the hints and suggestions of subtlety put into it. Without reading the book much would be missed. With my considerable insensitivity, the film would not be as powerful seeing it before reading the book. Each can stand on its own as seperate artistic efforts. Obviously, you will conclude both should be experienced, book first. This is my recommendation.
Review ID: 10000000008596897

Thank you for voting. If your vote meets our
guidelines, it will be posted within 24 hours.
You cannot vote on the helpfulness of a review you wrote.
Your request cannot be processed at this time. Please try again later.