Screwed by Thom Hartmann (2006, Hardcover)

I worked hard just to reach the middle class, but was only able to stay there about fifteen years. This book makes it clear how the middle class money was sucked out. There are a few comments in the book that may be a tad too liberal for some, but the facts are the facts. Read it and weep.

Excellent reading for everyone. Thom provides great insight to the problems of today's corporate government.

I really enjoyed this book because I am interested in learning about the many lies that our government has told us. I am interested in truth and in The Constitution that was written for a democracy to exist...for the people, by the people and our constitutional rights that were violated during the Bush administration. This book contains a great deal of information and the things that "We as a nation" need to do to continue being a democratic nation.

In "Screwed," Thom Hartmann reveals a fuller picture of liberal issues that have conservatives pulling out their own hair trying to understand.
This book is a valuable and relevant read that both sides of the political spectrum would be well served by reading. If you don't dig Hartmann's politics, buy one secondhand or get one from your library, take it at face value there is an agenda here. Hartmann mixes a pinch of brilliance, a scoop of thoughtful revelations tossed heavily with a share of some absurd left-wing craziness. Some points he makes are fairly well cited, some others, not so much.
Hartmann tackles many subjects that embroil partisan politics in name calling and foster general voter malaise.
Much of Hartmann's criticisms blame the Reagan Administration for the current tide of economic chaos. To do so assumes American economic soundness through the Carter Administration, an assumption I challenge more than a handful of people to embrace.
Much of this book is Hartman's call for big government, or at least considerable bureaucracy and government oversight. But he tries to blame the federal government for failures during Hurricane Katrina while dismissing its successes in Florida (hurricanes Charley, Francis, Ivan and Jeanne) as political cronyism between the Bush brothers.
In this instance, he ignores the fact that Florida had a long history of hurricane preparedness, one easily rivaling Louisiana's long history of corrupt and inefficient government. Sorry Thom, you can't have it both ways.
Hartmann seeks to vilify a political system (no less deserving of such a label), by targeting his frustrations consistently with his well established anti-conservative ideology.
He touts Roosevelt's WPA and other works projects, but fails to consider the windfall contracts Roosevelt handed out to Halliburton predecessors like the Morrison-Knudsen Company, W.A. Bechtel, MacDonald & Kahn Ltd., Union Carbide Corporation and enough others to fill the margins of this review.
On healthcare, Hartmann uses Great Britain as a shining example of cradle to grave medical coverage. He fails to grasp that many in Great Britain now seek treatment for common in-patient procedures in nations like India, Thailand or (believe it or not) the U.S. due to gross inefficiency or cold hearted bureaucratic inflexibility in England(See 60 Minutes, CBS, Sept. 4, 2005). Hartmann suggests that health care is a right, I would say that access to healthcare is a right, but not the care itself. I'll also add that a village shaman does not constitute a modern equivalent of "health care."
Hartmann's anti-union, anti-Taft-Hartley litmus test is like saying a person is an atheist because they are pro-choice.
I will agree with Hartmann on many of his thoughts about a living wage, stopping privatization (especially in the military, public utilities and prisons), and increasing tariffs that are punitive to big corporations growing fat off cheap foreign labor.
I commend Hartmann's attempt to reach across the aisle of party lines and his call to become involved in politics. Many of the works Hartmann cites in his arguments are important tools for Americans to begin anew a proper political discourse and deliberation if we are to preserve this experiment in democracy.
REVIEW EVERY BOOK YOU READ, WRITERS AND PUBLISHERS NEED TO KNOW WHAT WE LIKE, PARTICULARLY IF WE WANT MORE GOOD BOOKS!