
After 50 Years of SciFi, I met Scalzi's Writings

The writing of John Scalzi and the Universe's he has created have revived my belief that there still is GOOD Science Fiction being written and published.
After becoming disillusioned with the multi-book series' of stories about wizards or whatever that don't come to a conclusion but force you to buy more and more books just to have the story end. Poorly written at best and jumbles of intertwining ideas, using as many words as possible to convince the reader that there is actually merit to the story. This, in my opinion, had become the norm of Science Fiction.
Re-reading my favorites: Heinlien, Asimov, Smith, Blish, Anderson, Hogan, et al and even the one book wonders like Hubbard and Herbert (my apologies to those two author's fans, but frankly "Dune" and "Battlefield Earth" were the penultimates of their story telling) I have become able to recite whole paragraphs from memory. I started with "Red Planet" in the 50's along with "Mystery of Saddle Mountain" and was hooked. You would have found a SciFi title on my night stand for 25 years. But then, it seemed that the area just dried up.
My son was introduced to SciFi from my library of paperbacks when he was a boy and now he returned the favor by giving me a copy of "Old Man's War" for Christmas. From the first page, I was enthralled.
Scalzi's ability to use conversations between characters (ala Heinlien) to develop the story and add depth to those characters at the same time, is amazing. His easy going style, unpretentious and captivating, is marvelous.
"old Man's War", "Ghost Brigades" and "Last Colony" compromise the Old Man's War Trilogy, but "Zoes Tale" and "The Sagan Diaries" are inter-twined books. Each of the Trilogy is one story, standing alone but the entire set of five become a tale you hate to see end.
One a scale of 1-10, these fascinating works of SciFi(and Scalzi and his other books) are 20's!
Review ID: 10000000011886886

Thank you for voting. If your vote meets our
guidelines, it will be posted within 24 hours.
You cannot vote on the helpfulness of a review you wrote.
Your request cannot be processed at this time. Please try again later.