
Minolta Maximum Cheapos...
0 of 1 people found this review helpful.
I have a great respect for Minolta: innovation, craftsmanship, leading technology.
It seems that after Minolta got burned some time back for producing some superior quality 35mm SLR's that ultimately proved to be too expensive to produce and to compete with in the mass market world, they changed gears in a bad direction.
Minolta continued innovation and advancements, trouble is they packaged them in some of the worst bodies ever produced, lenses and camera bodies. Cheap plastic, too much plastic, too much effort towards saving cost in cheaply conceived packages. After the metal bodies Minolta hyped the world and the world soon found out that Minolta was junk. Too bad versions like these ruin the great efforts in the past, while surely remarkable inventions resulted putting them in junkie cheap bodies severely effected this company. To think Leitz picked them as the best Japanese camera maker to share and have joint involvements with only to end up producing garbage like this model was. 3, 300, 0R 3000 7, 700, 7000 IF IT WAS PLASTIC IT WAS JUNK, Beware...
Review ID: 10000000005627955

Thank you for voting. If your vote meets our
guidelines, it will be posted within 24 hours.
You cannot vote on the helpfulness of a review you wrote.
Your request cannot be processed at this time. Please try again later.