
Love the movie; one UPC-based listing detail inaccurate
Review created: 08/13/08(updated 08/13/08)

Rather than go into why I love the movie "Logan's Run", famous for being the last old-school sci-fi movie before Star Wars, I will try to shed light on what you actually get on this DVD version.
It is a nicely boxed, double-sided, DVD released in 2000, with a different display-width format of the entire movie on each side. You get no pamphlets or other extra things physically, though there are some good extra features on the DVD.
One side has the pan/scan version to fill a standard 1.33 aspect ratio TV screen. Flip it over to get the wider-screen version, on any normal DVD player.
While the other side is alleged (in the data called up into eBay listings via the UPC, no fault of anyone selling it...) to have the 2.35 aspect ratio "anamorphic widescreen" letterboxed version, it is actually far less wide/letterboxed than that. I didn't measure the blank strips on my TV to get the exact number, but it is pretty surely either the standard 1.66 movie format, or 16:9 (=1.78) intended for HDTV. It is absolutely, positively not 2.35:1, and I did check that the UPC on mine is the right UPC, etc.
So you get both the version which is the perfect screen-filling normal pan/scan for regular TV and the version which is the perfect (or nearly so, maybe very slightly boxed off on the sides) wide pan/scan for widescreen HDTV.
While movie aficionados pooh-pooh pan/scan versus watching the as-filmed widescreen aspect ratio, using screen-filling pan/scan has its benefits.
Namely, watching this movie at 1.33 instead of 2.35 on a standard TV screen, everything you see is physically 2.35/1.33 = 1.77x as big on the screen, covering 3.12x as much area. And 1.66 vs 2.35 is 1.41x as big and 2.00x the area.
Now I don't know about you, but I think this movie is worth watching in the 1.33 pan/scan mode on a big standard-shape TV at least once. Namely, having any given detail (including the beautiful Jenny Agutter's briefly-naked body at age 22-23) take up 3x the area that it would in fully letterboxed 2.35 anamorphic format, is probably more desirable than having extra scenery out in left field and right field.
On a widescreen TV, the 1.33 version has the same magnification as the 1.66 version, and just chops off the sides more than needed, so of course watch the 1.66 side if your TV is 16:9 widescreen, to catch more side scenery.
Last but not least, the sound is unusually good for a movie of this age, with it supposedly being the first movie recorded in Dolby 5.1 Surround.
Review ID: 10000000008345460

Thank you for voting. If your vote meets our
guidelines, it will be posted within 24 hours.
You cannot vote on the helpfulness of a review you wrote.
Your request cannot be processed at this time. Please try again later.