Portions of this page Copyright 1981 - 2008 Muze Inc.
All rights reserved.
All rights reserved.| Movie Description The acclaimed New Zealand director Jane Campion (THE PIANO) turns her unusual artistic eye toward the urban erotic thriller genre. Based on the novel by Susanna Moore, IN THE CUT tells the story of Frannie (Meg Ryan) an English teacher living in Manhattan's East Village who finds herself mixed up in a homicide investigation after a severed head turns up in her garden. Jennifer Jason Leigh is her sexually unhinged half-sister and Mark Ruffalo plays a homicide detective who falls into bed with Frannie after she's attacked on the Lower East Side. Suspects include her stalker ex-lover (Kevin Bacon) and a troubled student (Sharrieff Pugh) who's obsessed with serial killer John Wayne Gacy. As the body count rises however, Frannie realizes that the prime suspect just may be the very cop in her bed. If this all sounds like a by-the-numbers sex crime thriller don't worry; Campion twists the genre towards her own ends, adding multi-layered focus, deeply saturated colors, a dream-like mood and copious amounts of feminist allegorical symbolism. Meg Ryan fans should be shocked by her performance here (replete with several nude scenes), which is a major departure from her usual cute characterizations. Nicole Kidman, who starred in Campion's PORTRAIT OF A LADY served as producer. Fans of that film, and Campion's work in general, should enjoy the perverse psychosexual theatrics on display in this grim urban fairy tale.
Notes DVD Features: Region 1 Keep Case Widescreen Audio: Dolby Digital 5.1 Additional Release Material: Audio Commentary - 1. Jane Campion - Director Trailers Featurettes - 1. Making Of 2. SLANG DICTIONARY, Theatrical Release: OCTOBER 22, 2003 (NY/LA) OCTOBER 31, 2003 (EXPANDS) Editorial Reviews Total Film - Jamie Graham (11/01/2003) New York Times - A. O. Scott (10/22/2003) Los Angeles Times - Manohla Dargis (10/22/2003) Variety - Todd McCarthy (09/15/2003) Sight and Sound - Leslie Felperin (12/01/2003) Premiere - Glenn Kenny (12/01/2003) Chicago Sun-Times - Roger Ebert (10/31/2003) | Find errors in the product description? Submit a catalog update request now. | ||||||||||
Review created: 12/21/03 by: lemon_lime -- a member of Epinions Pros: Ryan, Ruffalo, Leigh Cons: messy, unsatisfying In the Cut made its way into and out of theatres rather quickly, what little attention it managed to garner owing mostly to Meg Ryan's bravura turn away from America's rom-com sweetheart and decidedly towards full-frontal nudity. Give that a good many people doubted Ms. Ryan could be any kind of a serious actress - and in a Jane Campion film no less - and that many men have been wondering what she looks like completely naked since her "orgasm in the diner" scene from When Harry Met Sally, it seems In the Cut would've made more of an impression at the box office. That it didn't, with such a built-in curiosity factor, would seem to point towards it being a horrible film, but it's not really. While Susanna Moore's 1995 novel (upon which this is based) is undoubtedly better, the film itself is rather decent, in its own way. Franny (Ryan) is stuck in the rather intellectually satisfying by emotionally and sexually dead life that she has created for herself. A literature teacher, she is obsessed with words, with language and power. She is writing a book about ghetto slang and, while interviewing a student of hers in a bar one afternoon, she oversees a sexual encounter between a woman and a faceless man with a tattoo on his wrist in the back room. The next day, the same woman is found dead, her decapitated body dumped partly in the garden behind Franny's apartment complex. Soon, she is visited by Detective Malloy (Mark Ruffalo, also playing much against type), the uber-masculine tough guy cop who has been assigned to the murder case. And who also has the exact same tattoo as the man Franny saw in the bar the night before. Those looking for a thriller or whodunnit film are, at this point, advised to remember that this will not be that kind of film. In fact, if those type of genre films are your particular cup of tea, you're probably going to hate In the Cut. Because, despite seeming to head down familiar genre roads in its first half hour, this film could ultimately care less about who, in fact, done it. Jane Campion, who adapted (along with author Moore) and directed the film isn't at all interested in making that type of film. Any one at all familiar with her previous work (Sweetie, The Piano, Holy Smoke) shouldn't be all that surprised by this; Campion, after all, has yet to make a truly straight forward film to date. For, in her world, atmosphere, mood, and feeling are often far more important than getting the audience from Point A to Point B. Therein would most likely lie the explanation for this film's rather massive failure when released earlier this year. This film does have problems, to be sure. It is often far too arty for its own good, as if a swiveling camera will somehow make painfully obvious scenes inherently deep and important. Also grating, at times, is the soundtrack itself - which starts with a marvelously discordant (and appropriate) "Que Sera, Sera" before sliding off track into banality and repetition. At times, it's as if everything around Meg Ryan is conspiring to overshadow her rather bold performance and render it helplessly stuck in a pretentious and not particularly noteworthy film. Still, Ryan's performance is strong enough for me to recommend the film, and not because she took off her clothes but rather because she actually took chances as an actress for the first time in a long time, actually taking on the part as opposed to relying on the shock value of "Meg Ryan being in a film like this" to raise her respectability on its own. It's truly unlike anything she has ever done on screen, and one has to give her due credit for the performance. Ruffalo is good as well, as is Jennifer Jason Leigh (as Franny's troubled sister), and there are moments that work incredibly well in In the Cut. Unforunately, there are moments which just don't, and the film as a whole drags needlessly on to the two hour mark, when 90 minutes would have more than sufficed. This is by no means a great film, but it is perhaps one worth watching if there is nothing else available. You know, because Meg Ryan is naked in it and all. Review ID: 10000000000637008 Epinions.com ratings are not included in the item's average rating. Links in this review may have been removed. |
| Create a product description! Creating and modifying product descriptions is fun and easy. Any member can, and is encouraged to, contribute to our member-created product descriptions. |
| Member-created product descriptions are typically composed of four sections: |
| 1- An introduction: Provide an overall description of the product, including when it was first introduced and a few key features. 2- A detailed description: Add product details and specifications. 3- Any additional information: Add information such as how the product works or any special menu options. 4- A summary: Add pros and cons, as well as overall impressions of the product. |
| That's all there is to it. Contributing to a product description is simple, and you can always edit your content if you don't like what you wrote. Click Create to get started. |
All rights reserved.| Replace this search |
Email me daily when new items match my search for | |