
Laserjet 1300 is still better than new HP printers

The 1300 prints about twice as fast as the 1200, but both are equally robust. Here's some info that you won't find on HP's website.
1. The aging HP Laserjet 1300 is still a very reliable printer. I have several 1300's with 120,000+ pages printed through it that are still working. With no maintenance at all. For a smaller printer, thats pretty good. Replacing a fuser isn't as quick as the 2420, P3005, 4000, 4200 series printers, but I've only had to replace 1 fuser out of 20 1300's so far.
2. HP Laserjet 1300 works well with every USB or Parallel print server that I've encountered-- Jetdirects, Netgears, and D-Links. The new HP line of laserjet printers are "host-based" (in other words, CHEAP), and most of them don't work at all with print servers. This was intentional by HP both a) to cut costs and b) deter people from networking their small laserjet printers. That's a real pain in the neck for administrators in small businesses who want to TCP/IP network some of their printers to cut costs.
3. The cost per page (CPP) out of the 1200 and 1300 series printers is much lower than the new line of equally sized HP printers. 1200 uses C7115X, 3500 pages, around $72 plus tax ship. 1300 uses Q2613X, 4000 pages, around $92 plus tax ship. CPP is roughly 2.5 cents/page. The new desktop HP laserjets have a CPP of 4 cents/page, and sometimes even higher.
Summary-- if you're an individual who doesn't print a whole lot, then getting a fancy new HP printer will do you fine. But our offices (150 employees) are still using these 1300's, because these "just work", and they do it at a cost that's actually reasonable.
Review ID: 10000000008040794

Thank you for voting. If your vote meets our
guidelines, it will be posted within 24 hours.
You cannot vote on the helpfulness of a review you wrote.
Your request cannot be processed at this time. Please try again later.